• PokerChips@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    These things should not be protected property. If you assault my privacy, I should be allowed to attack back.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      Most countries it’s legal to record in public, as there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy. Though these are a bit different than say someone with a phone or camera, as unless you pay close attention the glasses are easy to miss…

      • entwine@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        I disagree. Secretly recording someone with a phone is much easier than doing it with one of these. It’s the same issue people had with Google Glass back in the day.

        I think the reason it feels creepier is because, if you’re talking with someone that’s wearing them, it feels like they’re sticking a camera in your face.

        But like I could turn on my phone camera, leave it sticking out of my pocket, and record everyone taking a piss in a public restroom with nobody noticing. If I tried to do that with glasses, I’d have to turn my head towards everyone’s cock, one at a time. The neck pain alone makes it not worth the effort.

        But to be clear, fuck Meta. These glasses should be banned for many other reasons.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          Agree with you for the most part.

          Though your example of a public toilet is a bit flawed, since there IS a reasonable expectation of privacy.

          Google Glass was waaaaaaaaaay more obvious.

          Where the meta ones are a little less so.

          Depending on lighting, and distance from the Glasshole, could be really hard to spot the Meta ones.